Back

Therapeutic signature mapping of paired direct and indirect LPS injury in an ex vivo human lung perfusion platform reveals injury-specific druggable programs

Abdalla, A. A.; Pellicoro, A.; Quinn, T. M.; Dickson, S.; Marshall, A.; Bruce, A.; Cole, J. J.; Finlayson, K.; O'Connor, R. A.; Haslett, C.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Dhaliwal, K.

2026-08-07 immunology
10.64898/2026.08.03.739838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) remains highly morbid and lacks approved disease-modifying pharmacotherapies. Direct (pulmonary) and indirect (extrapulmonary) insults may initiate biologically distinct early injury programs, but human tissue-level evidence from the first hours is scarce. Here we establish a paired, acellular ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) platform using human donor lungs unsuitable for transplantation to model direct (endobronchial) and indirect (perfusate) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injury within the same donor. We profiled lung tissue proteomes at 4 h post-insult and performed therapeutic nomination by querying proteomics-derived injury signatures against the CLUE L1000 perturbational compendium with independent cross-platform validation. Both models developed histological injury and robust cytokine release. Direct injury preferentially enriched neutrophil degranulation, extracellular matrix remodelling and metabolic reprogramming modules, whereas indirect injury showed prominent complement/coagulation perturbation with greater endothelial activation markers in perfusate. Cross-platform prioritisation converged on tractable signalling and epigenetic axes, including JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, SYK, CDK and HDAC inhibitor classes - yielding a tiered shortlist for EVLP intervention testing. This intact human lung perturbation platform enables injury-stratified mechanistic inference and therapeutic prioritisation in early lung injury relevant to ARDS.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.