Back

Multidimensional symptom burden across sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy: cross-sectional associations with chronic pain interference and work disability in UK Biobank

Ciechanowicz, S.; Li, K.; Ma, D.

2026-08-05 pain medicine
10.64898/2026.08.03.26359604 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Sleep, pain, affect, cognition and energy (SPACE) has been described as a latent symptom-severity construct in chronic overlapping pain conditions. Its population-level structure and associations with chronic pain interference and functional disability remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of UK Biobank participants. Prespecified standardised symptom domains were examined using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis and k-means clustering. Associations with chronic pain interference, current work disability, poor self-rated health and longstanding illness or disability were assessed using covariate-adjusted logistic regression. A four-domain score excluding pain tested whether associations extended beyond the pain domain. Secondary analyses examined convergence with actigraphy, biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and brain magnetic resonance imaging phenotypes. Results: Of 501,935 eligible participants, 475,134 had complete domain data. Domains were modestly intercorrelated (r=0.04-0.46). Clustering identified lower- and higher-burden phenotypes comprising 70.5% and 29.5% of participants; current work disability occurred in 1.3% and 10.3%, respectively. Adding the four non-pain domains increased the area under the curve for chronic pain interference from 0.593 to 0.672 and for work disability from 0.748 to 0.850. Inclusion of pain increased the work-disability area under the curve to 0.863. Multimodal measures added smaller increments. Conclusions: A multidimensional symptom profile was identifiable at population scale and was concurrently associated with chronic pain interference and work disability, with non-pain domains contributing information beyond pain burden alone.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.