Methodological Impacts on Microbiome Structure and Indicator Status in the Human Lower Respiratory Tract
Noonan, A. J. C.; Myers, R.; McLaughlin, R. J.; Nag, A.; Chen, S.; Bartolomeu, C.; Borden, S. A.; Lam, S.; Hallam, S.
Show abstract
RationaleLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death globally, and rising incidence among traditionally low-risk individuals intensifies the need for improved early-detection methods that the lower-airway microbiome may inform. ObjectivesTo evaluate how respiratory tract sampling method shapes inferred microbiome structure, and whether bronchial brushing recovers a microbial community ecologically distinct from BAL and oral rinse. MethodsProspective cohort of 33 participants (8 lung cancer, 25 non-cancer controls) underwent oral rinse, bilateral bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and bronchial brushing. Microbiome structure was characterized by small subunit ribosomal rRNA gene amplicon sequence variant (ASV) profiling, with indicator-species analysis and SPIEC-EASI correlation-network mapping used to identify ASVs associated with sample type or cancer status. Measurements and Main ResultsSampling method was the dominant axis of variation. BAL communities closely resembled oral rinse (65 jointly indicative ASVs; none shared with brushing), whereas bronchial brushing yielded a distinct but low-biomass signal. After excluding host-derived sequences, two brush-specific indicator ASVs affiliated with Sphingomonadaceae and an uncultured Steroidobacteraceae were identified that co-localized within a single co-occurrence module. Cancer-status effects were not detectable in this pilot cohort, consistent with limited statistical power. ConclusionsSampling method is the primary determinant of inferred respiratory microbiome structure. Bronchial brushing recovers a distinct but low-biomass signal that is obscured when BAL is used in isolation. However, overlap between this low-biomass signal with host and contaminant sequences indicates that confidently resolving a discrete lower-airway community will require deeper sequencing and dedicated contamination controls. These methodological findings directly inform the design of future cancer-and disease-association studies.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenome-assembled genomes of Estonian Microbiome cohort reveal novel species and their links with prevalent diseases 93%
- Microbiota-metabolites interactions in non-human primate gastrointestinal tract 92%
- Elucidating syntrophic butyrate-degrading populations in anaerobic digesters using stable isotope-informed genome-resolved metagenomics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of an ecology-based analytic approach to discriminate signal and noise in low-biomass microbiome studies: whole lung tissue is the preferred sampling method for amplicon-based characterization of murine lung microbiota 95%
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Demographic, Environmental and Host Genetic Associations with Gut Microbiome Diversity in Healthy Individuals 93%
- Upper respiratory microbial communities of healthy populations are shaped by niche and age 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A prevalent and culturable microbiota links ecological balance to clinical stability of the human lung after transplantation 93%
- Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism 92%
- Mechanical ventilation affects respiratory microbiome of COVID-19 patients and its interactions with the host 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.