Back

MreB is dispensable for viability but critical for rod shape, motility and biofilm fitness in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Tunc, M. N.; Gerard, M.; Barbotin, A.; Noirot-Gros, M.-F.; Gregoire, M.; Douarre, P.-E.; Bridier, A.; Delaby, M.; Brun, Y. V.; Porter, S. L.; Briandet, R.; Carballido-Lopez, R.

2026-08-02 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.02.742333 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite growing interest in the MreBCD morphogenetic complex as a potential antimicrobial target, its function in Pseudomonas aeruginosa remains poorly understood. While previous studies using the MreB inhibitor A22 have established its role in cell shape maintenance and pilus regulation, the impact of mreB deletion has not been comprehensively investigated. Using genetic and microscopy-based approaches, we show that deletion of mreB is viable in P. aeruginosa, but results in spherical cells that lose all forms of motility despite retaining flagella. Importantly, we uncover a previously overlooked polar effect of the in-frame mreB deletion on the downstream mreCD genes and show, using CRISPRi-mediated silencing, that mreCD expression is essential for viability.{Delta} mreB mutants also display increased sensitivity to {beta}-lactam antibiotics and enhanced initial surface attachment, yet form more compact biofilms with reduced dispersal. In mixed-culture biofilms, spherical{Delta} mreB cells are outcompeted by rod-shaped wild-type cells and remain confined to the biofilm base. The identification of natural P. aeruginosa isolates carrying truncated mreB alleles further indicates that loss of MreB function can be tolerated in natural populations. Together, our findings reveal important contributions of the MreBCD system to viability, morphogenesis, motility and biofilm development in P. aeruginosa, providing new insights into bacterial adaptation and informing the development of targeted antimicrobial strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.