Back

Targeting AXL Overcomes Adaptive Resistance to KRAS Inhibition in KRAS-Driven Cancer

Thege, F. I.; Kramer, A.; Kreisz, N.; Salim, I.; Girum Girma, E.; Welte, L.; Adams, E.; Pluchinsky, A.; Kirschstein, E.; Harder, O.; Hoskins, A.; Seetharaman, A.; Rajapakshe, K.; Makino, Y.; Gunderson, A. J.; Woermann, S. M.; Maitra, A.

2026-08-04 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.02.742234 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Direct KRAS inhibitors have established mutant KRAS as a clinically actionable target, yet adaptive resistance remains a major barrier to durable responses. To identify therapeutically actionable resistance mechanisms, we performed an unbiased in vivo CRISPR activation screen in an autochthonous lung adenocarcinoma model, identifying the receptor tyrosine kinase AXL as a dominant adaptive resistance driver. Pharmacologic AXL inhibition enhanced the efficacy of both allele-specific inhibition and the RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor daraxonrasib across lung and pancreatic cancer models, resulting in deeper and more durable suppression of MAPK signaling and improved tumor control. Beyond tumor-intrinsic effects, combined KRAS and AXL inhibition remodeled the tumor immune microenvironment, promoting an IFN{gamma}-responsive program, increased recruitment of cytotoxic T cells and sensitization to FAS-mediated apoptosis. Collectively, our findings identify AXL as a convergence point for adaptive resistance to KRAS inhibition and provide a mechanistically informed combination strategy to extend the durability of KRAS-directed therapies. Statement of SignificanceAn unbiased in vivo functional (CRISPR activation) screen identifies AXL as a convergence point for adaptive resistance to KRAS inhibition. By integrating adaptive response to KRAS inhibition with anti-tumor immunity, AXL represents a mechanistically actionable vulnerability whose inhibition deepens and prolongs responses to both allele-specific and pan-KRAS-targeted therapies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.