Back

Goal Attainment Scale light captures clinically meaningful changes in Adolescents and Adults with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Risdiplam

Nungo Garzon, N. C.; Aragon-Gawinska, K.; Pitarch Castellano, I.; Sevilla, T.; Hervas, D.; Vazquez-Costa, J. F.

2026-08-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.02.26359391 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction/Aims To evaluate the usefulness of the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) light for assessing response to risdiplam in patients with SMA aged [≥]15 years. Methods In this population-based, longitudinal, ambispective study, patients were evaluated before and at 12 and 24 months after risdiplam initiation using motor scales (SMA Functional Composite Score Revised [SMA-FCR]), pinch strength (MyoPinch), functional scales (EK2, ALSFRS-R), patient and clinician global impression of change (PGIC and CGIC), and GAS light. Longitudinal changes were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. The minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of GAS light were calculated. Results Forty-four patients (median age 32 years; 56.8% female) were included: 31.8% non-sitters, 56.8% sitters, and 11.4% walkers. GAS light priorities differed across functional subgroups, with patients prioritising moderately affected domains. After 24 months of risdiplam treatment, motor outcomes showed non-significant improvements in walkers, whereas functional scales improved significantly only in non-sitters. In contrast, GAS light detected significant, increasing improvements across all functional subgroups. The MCIC and MDC for GAS light were 6.5 and 10.65 points, respectively. According to the CGIC, 58% of patients improved slightly, 29% remained stable, and 13% worsened slightly at 24 months. Using the MCIC threshold, 64.5% achieved clinically meaningful goal improvement. Discussion GAS light is a feasible, sensitive, patient-centred tool that may complement standardised outcome measures when evaluating treatment response in adults with SMA. These findings further support risdiplam as a valuable therapeutic option in this population.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.