Hive position matters: spatial layout and hive colour impact forager traffic and drifting in Melipona quadrifasciata bees
Cipriano, A. P.; Menezes, C.; Munro, M.; Bell, E.; Gruter, C.
Show abstract
Stingless bees are key pollinators of native and cultivated plants, and their management mostly for honey and hive commercialisation has become an increasingly popular practice in Brazil. Hives are commonly kept close together and visually similar in meliponaries, a practice that favours drifting, i.e., the return of foragers to a foreign nest. Distance between hives and layout have been identified as drivers of drifting in the Western honeybee, but evidence for stingless bees, the largest group of social bees, remains scarce. Additionally, stingless beekeepers frequently associate drifting with weakened colonies, uneven honey production, worker fighting, and colony population imbalances. We investigated the effects of hive layout on foraging traffic and drifting in the stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata. We compared forager traffic across six layouts varying in distance, colour and entrance orientation. Then, using RFID tags, we tracked drifting across three layouts with the same inter-hive distance but different designs: visually similar hives, hives with opposite entrance orientation, and hives painted with distinct colours. Forager traffic was lowest in the visually similar layout during the first two weeks of monitoring, which is consistent with greater disorientation in the absence of clear visual cues. Hive position was a key driver of drifting behaviour across all layouts, with bees from edge hives drifting considerably less than those from inner hives. Drifting decreased considerably in hives with different colours (37.6%) and hives with entrances in opposite directions (48.1%), compared to similarly looking hives with entrances in the same direction (59.5%). Therefore, our findings highlight practical low-effort strategies for stingless beekeepers to reduce forager loss, pathogen spread, and productivity losses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing the appetitive learning performance of six European honeybee subspecies in a common apiary 95%
- Decline of honeybees and its consequences for beekeepers and crop pollination in western Nepal 94%
- Crop and Semi-Natural Habitat Configuration affects Diversity and Abundance of Native Bees (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) in a Large-Scale Cotton Agroecosystem 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social task and aggressiveness shape immunity gene expression levels in the head of highly eusocial bees 94%
- Similarities in the behaviour of dance followers among honey bee species suggest a conserved mechanism of dance communication 94%
- Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.