Back

The physiological dynamic clamp allows insect flight muscle to transition between two actuation modes in virtual reality

Wold, E.; Yang, R.; Liu, E.; Gravish, N.; Sponberg, S.

2026-08-06 physiology
10.64898/2026.07.31.742123 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In most muscles, contraction is initiated by neural activation. Some groups of insects break this rule, flapping at frequencies far exceeding the neural drive to their flight muscles. These insects muscles (termed asynchronous) produce force in response to stretch, enabling flight at faster frequencies than would be possible through the slow calcium-dependent processes associated with neural activation. The first flapping insects lacked stretch-activated physiology, which then evolved on top of neural activation dynamics before likely being reduced again in some groups including moths. Stretch and neural activation can co-exist, but it remains unclear if stretch-activation alone is sufficient to generate asynchronous flapping in insect flight muscle. Building on prior closed-loop muscle physiology platforms, we develop a new way to perform a gain-of-function muscle physiology experiment called the physiological dynamic clamp. Inspired by dynamic clamp experiments in neuroscience, we couple isolated intact flight muscle from a hawkmoth, Manduca sexta, to simulated stretch-activation in virtual reality. Tuning virtual reality parameters allows us to manipulate the degree of stretch-activation in silico while retaining all other physiological properties of the muscle. With artificially enhanced stretch activation, we find that hawkmoth muscle can support stretch-activated work at typical wingbeat frequencies. When simultaneously stimulated at wingbeat frequency, interference between stretch and neural activation results in variable work production. However, this interference disappears when the two activation timescales are close to each other resulting in entrainment to the neural drive. Matching time scales suggests an evolutionary path for smoothly transitioning to stretch-activated, asynchronous flight and back again.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.