Back

Behavioural type drives discovery and exploitation of anthropogenic resources

Wild, S.; Uyehara, I. K.; Todd, L. M.; Ravara, T. A.; Sih, A.; Smith, J. E.

2026-08-06 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.07.31.742110 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human-influenced environments pose challenges but also provide wildlife with anthropogenic resources. Individuals vary widely in their ability to exploit such resources, often as a function of behavioural type. However, we lack a clear understanding of how variation in behavioural traits influences stages of resource exploitation required to use anthropogenic resources. Using fully automated foraging puzzles, we examined how boldness and sociability influenced three aspects of resource exploitation - discovery, problem-solving, and overall performance - in two wild populations of California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi). Bolder individuals discovered the resource earlier, solved the task faster and achieved higher performance, indicating that boldness promotes efficient exploitation of anthropogenic resources across multiple stages in the process. Greater sociability and more opportunities to observe conspecifics solving the task led to faster problem-solving, consistent with evidence for observational learning. Squirrels in the recreational-use population - with regular exposure to humans and anthropogenic food - were faster to discover the resource than those in a trail-use population - where human exposure was transient and no anthropogenic food available. Problem-solving latency and performance were consistent between populations. Our findings highlight how individual variation in behavioural traits drives performance in novel ecological contexts, providing a mechanistic understanding of behavioural plasticity in human-influenced environments.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.