Back

Dorsal Striatum Silencing Attenuates Light Self-administration in Mice and Its Relevance to Digital technology-based Disorders

Tam, S. K. E.; Becker, B.

2026-08-05 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.07.31.742007 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsSubstance-use addiction models have demonstrated that a progressive transition from reward-guided to habitual and ultimately compulsive behaviour is mediated by a ventral-to-dorsal striatal shift in behavioural control. While symptomatic and neural similarities between substance and digital technology-based disorders have been hypothesised, the causal role of the striatum in the latter remains unknown. We here employ a validated mouse light self-administration paradigm with a loss-of-function approach to determine the role of the dorsal striatum in behavioural persistence towards non-food, non-drug reinforcers. MethodsMice received a control virus or a virus expressing the inhibitory designer receptor (hM4Di) into the dorsal striatum (caudate-putamen). The chemogenetic actuator clozapine N-oxide (CNO) was injected systemically shortly before selected sessions, silencing striatal neuronal firing in vivo in hM4Di-expressing mice. During operant training, lever presses were reinforced by light under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement (FR1, FR3, and FR5). ResultsOn initial training days, CNO reduced light self-administration in striatal hM4Di-expressing mice. CNO had a negligible effect in control mice under FR3 and FR5 but attenuated responding in hM4Di mice, which showed response recovery on days without CNO. Linear mixed-effects models confirmed an improvement in light self-administration across days, with a stronger detrimental effect of CNO in hM4Di mice. DiscussionDorsal striatum silencing attenuates light self-administration without impairing response acquisition. Thus, like drug self-administration, light self-administration relies partly on dorsal striatal neurons. Our work bridges the gap between animal models and human neuroimaging studies reporting shared brain mechanisms underlying non-drug and drug habits.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.