Developmental growth rates adapt to enable self-correction of organ morphology after injury.
Gunnan, S.; Kotz, M.; Ribas, L.; Kini, V. A.; Jay, S.; Kaufmann, S.; Angermann, E.; Berbee, N.; Perugini, C.; Friedrich, B. M.; Mateus, R.
Show abstract
Proportional organ growth requires tissue-level control of cell behavior. Yet the cues that adapt growth rates, especially after organ injury, remain unclear. Here, we uncover that developing organs are robust to extensive damage, triggering injury-specific mechanisms sufficient to override genetically-encoded size defects. Using precision microsurgery in developing zebrafish pectoral fins, we find that injury drives growth asynchronously across tissues and fin axes, by increasing proliferation and extracellular spacing. Growth compensation scales with the amount of tissue lost, restoring size and structure without compromising developmental timing. A feedback-control model captures these dynamics, suggesting that growth rates are regulated toward an organ-specific target area. At the molecular scale, injury signals bypass developmentally-regulated BMP gradient scaling. Injury instead activates de novo BMP signaling, which supports growth adaptation and rescues wildtype fin size in developmentally small mutants. Our findings identify an injury-dependent compensatory growth mechanism that resets developmental organ size, ensuring functional organ recovery.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell morphometrics reveals ancestral principles of notochord development 95%
- Dynamic protein assembly and architecture of the large solitary membraneless organelle during germline development in the wasp Nasonia vitripennis 94%
- The Pax6 master control gene initiates spontaneous retinal development via a self-organising Turing network 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.