Back

Beyond the Red Complex: De Novo Marker Discovery Uncovers Novel Periodontitis-Associated Taxa and Enables Non-Invasive Machine Learning Diagnosis

Koohi-Moghadam, M.; Leung, W. K.

2026-08-03 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.07.31.26359396 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Periodontitis affects over 1 billion people worldwide, yet diagnosis relies on clinical measures that capture tissue destruction rather than underlying microbial dysbiosis. Most microbial-biomarker studies use 16S rRNA sequencing or reference-database mapping, systematically under-detecting uncultivated or divergent taxa. Methods: We assembled 341 supra- and subgingival shotgun metagenomes (218 periodontitis, 123 health) across nine countries/regions. Using MetaMarker, a de novo, reference-free pipeline, we identified conserved genomic markers directly from reads in a 305-sample discovery pool without database mapping. Markers were taxonomically annotated against the Human Oral Microbiome Database, functionally annotated with Prodigal/eggNOG-mapper, and used for eight machine-learning classifiers, externally validated on three independent held-out cohorts (36 samples). Results: We recovered 2,142 significant markers (1,999 periodontitis-enriched, 143 health-enriched; q<0.05), recapitulating the canonical red/orange-complex dysbiotic shift. Beyond established pathogens, 128 periodontitis markers (6.4%) were novel, including an uncultivated Paludibacteraceae genus and divergent Fretibacterium fastidiosum strains. Case markers encoded a coherent virulence programme spanning proteolysis, haem/iron acquisition, and Type IX secretion. On external validation, boosted-tree classifiers generalized best (XGBoost and gradient boosting, AUC=0.96), and a compact SHAP-ranked 20-marker panel spanning five taxa reproduced full-set directionality. Conclusions: Reference-free metagenomic marker discovery recovers known periodontal pathobiology while revealing unrecognized candidate biomarkers and supports an accurate, externally validated, non-invasive classifier with translational potential as a compact diagnostic panel.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.