Back

Short-term, Long-term, and Genetic Determinants of Human Plasma Proteome Variability

Benacom, D.; Specht, A.; Nicholas, J. C.; Guillard, R.; Gillman, M.; Dubin, R.; Ganz, P.; Rotter, J. I.; Taylor, K. D.; Rich, S. S.; Liu, P. Y.; Wood, A. C.; Mi, M. Y.; Deo, R.; Zitting, K.-M.; Raffield, L. M.; Czeisler, C. A.; Duffy, J. F.; Mignot, E.

2026-08-05 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.30.741635 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plasma proteomics is increasingly used for biomarker discovery and predictive modeling, yet diurnal protein trajectories remain insufficiently characterized. In our review of recent proteomic biomarker studies, 43% of the identified biomarkers had previously been reported to display 24-h rhythmicity. We demonstrate that ignoring these short-term dynamic effects compromises the robustness of reported models predicting health outcomes. We integrated a population-scale multi-ethnic longitudinal cohort with repeated measures over 10 years, with two cohorts of healthy adults undergoing frequent plasma sampling across days under controlled circadian, sleep and food-intake conditions. This design enabled estimation of short-term intraindividual variability (ST), long-term intraindividual variability (LT), population-level variability (POP) and genetic effects (GEN) across 7,289 protein targets. ST, LT, POP, and GEN define diverse protein trajectories, including rapid dynamics, long-term change, and individual-specific signatures. Using and generalizing this framework will facilitate covariate selection, study design, biomarker prioritization, and variability-aware modeling by users of proteomic data. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=92 SRC="FIGDIR/small/741635v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (26K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@55520eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17e4bacorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9a0d0borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ce88fb_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.