Sources of Variability in Normative Cerebral FDG-PET imaging
Salvi de Souza, G.; Povala, G.; Peixoto, G. G. S.; Coutinho, A. M.; Bieger, A.; Rozalem-Aranha, M.; de Bastiani, M. A.; Zimmer, E. R.; Borelli, W.; de Souza, L. W.
Show abstract
PurposeQuantitative interpretation of brain [{superscript 1}F]FDG-PET increasingly relies on comparisons with normative datasets. However, normative values may be influenced by technical and biological factors, limiting their generalizability. We investigated the effects of scanner manufacturer, reference region, age, and sex on regional [{superscript 1}F]FDG uptake in cognitively normal (CN) adults and generated covariate-adjusted normative reference data. MethodsA total of 449 CN participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were included. Regional SUVr were calculated using three reference regions (whole cerebellum, pons, cortical gray matter) and converted to Z-scores. Linear regression models were used to estimate standardized regression coefficients ({beta}), and 10-fold cross-validation was performed to quantify the out- of-sample predictive contribution of each covariate using incremental explained variance ({Delta}R{superscript 2}). ResultsScanner manufacturer introduced large, spatially structured biases. Compared with Siemens systems, GE and Philips scanners yielded lower Z-scores in frontal and medial temporal regions, with effect sizes approaching one standard deviation in selected regions ({beta} up to -0.85). Age showed region- specific associations with subcortical nuclei, medial temporal structures, and the posterior cingulate cortex, and was the strongest biological predictor in cross-validation ({Delta}R{superscript 2}{approx}0.11). Sex effects were negligible ({Delta}R{superscript 2}<0.001). Cortical gray matter normalization minimized biological and technical confounding, and the AD meta-ROI demonstrated high robustness across manufacturers and normalization strategies. ConclusionScanner manufacturer and age are the major sources of variance in brain [{superscript 1}F]FDG-PET quantification in CN subjects. Cortical gray matter provides the most stable reference region and supports harmonized, covariate-adjusted normative datasets for clinical and research applications.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision Brain Morphometry Using Cluster Scanning 93%
- NODDI-derived measures of microstructural integrity in medial temporal lobe white matter pathways are associated with Alzheimer's disease pathology and cognitive outcomes 93%
- Sensitivity of unconstrained quantitative magnetization transfer MRI to Amyloid burden in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medial temporal atrophy in preclinical dementia: visual and automated assessment during six year follow-up 94%
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 94%
- Distinct and joint effects of low and high levels of Aβ and tau deposition on cortical thickness 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.