Back

Flattened brain hierarchy and increased EEG complexity during unusual bodily experiences and out-of-body experiences

Campillo-Ferrer, T.; Berjaga-Buisan, T.; Iadarola, A.; Vohryzek, J.; Cordani, R.; Veneruso, M.; Sanz Perl, Y.; Nobili, L.; Oostenveld, R.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Deco, G.

2026-08-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.30.741513 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Experiences in which the sense of the body becomes distorted offer a unique window into how the brain constructs the bodily self. Despite their clinical relevance in conditions such as depersonalization and body-image disorders, large-scale brain dynamics underlying unusual bodily experiences (UBEs) remain poorly understood, and no prior study has examined them systematically across wakefulness and sleep. Here, we analyzed a high-density EEG dataset including 36 UBE episodes, such as floating sensations, distorted body boundaries, and out-of-body experiences, recorded across rapid eye-movement (REM) sleep, light sleep, sleep arousals, and wakefulness during meditation (N=20). We quantified the temporal irreversibility of neural dynamics, a marker of cortical hierarchical organization, and complemented these analyses with whole-brain signal complexity measures following a within-subject design. UBEs were consistently associated with a global reduction in neural irreversibility and cortical hierarchical differentiation relative to non-UBEs and wakefulness, along with a concurrent increase in whole-brain complexity to levels comparable to wakefulness. Together, these findings suggest that UBEs reflect a neural state combining high informational richness with a transient flattening of cortical hierarchy, a profile that resembles that observed in psychedelic states. Key pointsO_LIUBEs are associated with a global flattening of brain hierarchy measured by EEG. C_LIO_LIUBEs are associated with increased global EEG complexity, resembling the psychedelic state. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.