Back

Transcript-Specific Site-Directed RNA Editing Reveals Principles for Splice-aware guide RNA Design

Schneider, N.; Zehoray, N.; Steinberg, R.; Banin, E.; Arsenijevic, Y.; Ben Aroya, S.; Levanon, E. Y.; Sharon, D.

2026-07-30 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.07.30.741163 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Site-directed RNA editing (SDRE) utilizing the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes is commonly facilitated by guide RNAs (gRNAs) optimized to enhance on-target editing and minimize bystander effects. However, the impact of gRNA binding and ADAR-mediated SDRE on canonical pre-mRNA splicing remains poorly understood. Here, we developed an in vitro transcript-specific editing strategy that enables selective targeting and direct comparison of SDRE in pre-mRNA and mature mRNA. Using splice-relevant variants associated with inherited retinal diseases, we investigated the effects of SDRE on exonic, near-canonical intronic, and deep intronic splice variants. We identified gRNA-induced splice perturbation at exonic and intronic targets and observed that higher editing levels could be associated with increased splice disruption. Conversely, SDRE of two exonic splice variants and a deep intronic variant resulted in increased production of correctly spliced transcripts, demonstrating the potential of SDRE for splice modulation. Finally, by dissecting the effects of ADAR expression and gRNA design on editing and splicing outcomes, we established a system for identifying design principles that reduce splice interference and enhance the generation of correctly spliced, edited transcripts. These findings highlight the importance of considering transcript context and splicing consequences in the development of SDRE-based therapeutic strategies. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=92 SRC="FIGDIR/small/741163v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2e4703org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3834d3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1409c8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18e463b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Created in BioRender. Schneider, N. (2026) https://BioRender.com/59i0tiy C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.