Comparative Analysis of Muscle Fascia Tracking Algorithms for Real-Time Muscle Monitoring using Wearable Ultrasound
King, E. L.; Delaney, C. M.; Lamarre, M. A.; Qureshi, A.; Sikdar, S.; Wei, Q.; Chitnis, P. V.
Show abstract
Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) enables real-time imaging of muscle structure and function, and wearable ultrasound (WUS) has extended this capability to dynamic movement tasks. Accurate tracking of muscle fascia displacement in M-mode WUS images is essential for quantifying muscle function, yet the relative performance of existing fascia-tracking algorithms remains uncharacterized. This study directly compares five fascia-tracking algorithms: Maximum Pixel Intensity (MPI), Muscle Boundary Tracking Algorithm (MBTA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Composite-Factorization PCA (CF-PCA), and U-Net segmentation, against expert-annotated ground truth to identify which approach best supports wearable muscle-monitoring applications. A total of 572 M-mode ultrasound images were collected during isometric quadricep activations (QA) and squats (SQ) using a multi-site WUS system with transducers positioned on the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis oblique (VMO). Fascia tracking using U-Net segmentation exhibited the lowest mean absolute error (median QA=0.57, median SQ=1.22; p<0.05), functional range not statistically different from expert traces (QA p=0.33; SQ p=1) and the most accurate estimates of functional error (median QA=-0.21; median SQ=-0.65; p<0.05). PCA-based methods demonstrated the highest correlation with the expert traces (PCA median QA=0.88; CF-PCA median QA=0.88; PCA median SQ=0.78; CF-PCA median SQ=0.75; p<0.005), reflecting superior tracking of relative contraction patterns. These results indicate U-Net segmentation is best suited for applications requiring precise fascia-depth estimation when labeled training data are available, while PCA-based methods are preferable for tracking relative contraction patterns without supervised training, informing algorithm selection for wearable neuromuscular monitoring in clinical and performance settings.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography 95%
- Quantifying mechanical loading and elastic strain energy of the human Achilles tendon during walking and running 92%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes In Muscle Quality Following Short-Term Resistance Training In Older Adults: A Comparison Of Echo Intensity And Texture Analysis 90%
- Indexing Cerebrovascular Health Using TranscranialDoppler Ultrasound 90%
- Validation of Left Ventricular High Frame Rate Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry against 4D Flow MRI in Patients 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: a systematic framework for motion artifact removal 91%
- Neuronal avalanches as a predictive biomarker of BCI performance- towards a tool to guide tailored training 89%
- Effects of Electric Field Direction on TMS-based Motor Cortex Mapping 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.