Back

Comparative Analysis of Muscle Fascia Tracking Algorithms for Real-Time Muscle Monitoring using Wearable Ultrasound

King, E. L.; Delaney, C. M.; Lamarre, M. A.; Qureshi, A.; Sikdar, S.; Wei, Q.; Chitnis, P. V.

2026-08-02 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.30.26359276 medRxiv
Show abstract

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) enables real-time imaging of muscle structure and function, and wearable ultrasound (WUS) has extended this capability to dynamic movement tasks. Accurate tracking of muscle fascia displacement in M-mode WUS images is essential for quantifying muscle function, yet the relative performance of existing fascia-tracking algorithms remains uncharacterized. This study directly compares five fascia-tracking algorithms: Maximum Pixel Intensity (MPI), Muscle Boundary Tracking Algorithm (MBTA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Composite-Factorization PCA (CF-PCA), and U-Net segmentation, against expert-annotated ground truth to identify which approach best supports wearable muscle-monitoring applications. A total of 572 M-mode ultrasound images were collected during isometric quadricep activations (QA) and squats (SQ) using a multi-site WUS system with transducers positioned on the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis oblique (VMO). Fascia tracking using U-Net segmentation exhibited the lowest mean absolute error (median QA=0.57, median SQ=1.22; p<0.05), functional range not statistically different from expert traces (QA p=0.33; SQ p=1) and the most accurate estimates of functional error (median QA=-0.21; median SQ=-0.65; p<0.05). PCA-based methods demonstrated the highest correlation with the expert traces (PCA median QA=0.88; CF-PCA median QA=0.88; PCA median SQ=0.78; CF-PCA median SQ=0.75; p<0.005), reflecting superior tracking of relative contraction patterns. These results indicate U-Net segmentation is best suited for applications requiring precise fascia-depth estimation when labeled training data are available, while PCA-based methods are preferable for tracking relative contraction patterns without supervised training, informing algorithm selection for wearable neuromuscular monitoring in clinical and performance settings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.