Back

Wearable Personal PM2.5 Monitoring During Wildfire Smoke Episodes in Metro Detroit

Zundel, C. G.; Fikes, T.; Strobel, E.; Schrimpf, M.; Marusak, H.

2026-07-31 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.30.26359253 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wildfire smoke has increasingly affected air quality across North America, raising concerns about the health effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure, including potential impacts on brain health. However, relatively few studies have characterized personal PM2.5 exposure during these events using wearable monitoring. We examined daily personal PM2.5 concentrations during wildfire smoke episodes in southeast Michigan alongside neighborhood outdoor PM2.5 estimates. Four participants (one adolescent and three adults) wore AirBeam3 personal monitors during ongoing studies. Neighborhood outdoor PM2.5 was estimated using the average of three nearest PurpleAir outdoor air quality sensors, and wildfire smoke days were identified using state air quality advisories. Group-level descriptive statistics summarized personal and neighborhood outdoor PM2.5 and self-reported time spent outdoors. Exploratory within-participant analyses quantified associations between neighborhood outdoor and personal PM2.5 concentrations on smoke and non-smoke days. Neighborhood outdoor daily PM2.5 concentrations were higher during wildfire smoke days than non-smoke days (87.6 + 80.2 vs. 12.3 + 7.0 {micro}g/m3). Personal PM2.5 concentrations were more than five times higher during wildfire smoke days (28.2 + 20.0 vs. 5.1 + 4.7 {micro}g/m3) than non-smoke days. Within participants, every 10 {micro}g/m3 increase in neighborhood PM2.5 was associated with 2.3 {micro}g/m3 increase in personal PM2.5 concentrations. Wearable PM2.5 monitoring captured elevated personal exposures while providing individual-level exposure information beyond neighborhood outdoor air quality estimates. These findings demonstrate that wearable monitoring complements neighborhood air quality measurements by capturing individual-level exposure, providing a more comprehensive assessment of real-world wildfire smoke exposure for future studies examining the effects on brain health.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.