Spectral Correlates of Encoding Distinguish Good from Poor Learners

Individuals vary in their ability to encode and recall new experiences, yet neural markers of memory have rarely been linked to these trait-level differences. Subsequent memory effects (SMEs) identify patterns of neural activity during encoding that predict whether an item will later be remembered or forgotten. In scalp EEG, SMEs are typically characterized by increased theta and gamma power with decreased alpha, a profile that has been interpreted as a signature of effective encoding. Here, we tested whether SMEs reflect individual differences in mnemonic ability by analyzing over 1.3 million encoding events from a large free recall dataset. At the group level, alpha suppression and theta enhancement predicted successful encoding, while gamma did not predict subsequent memory after controlling for serial position. Across individuals, better learners showed reduced SMEs in all three frequency bands. The neural contrast that defines successful encoding was therefore most pronounced among the poorest learners. These findings suggest that high-performing individuals are less reliant on phasic spectral activity for successful encoding, and that SMEs capture stable individual differences in encoding efficiency. HighlightsO_LIEEG activity during learning differentiates better from poorer learners C_LIO_LIEEG markers of successful encoding also reflect stable learning ability C_LIO_LIHigher-performing individuals show attenuated theta-alpha-gamma signatures C_LIO_LIEEG dynamics track both transient states and trait-like ability differences C_LI