Automated Neuron Tracing with Imitation Learning
Gray, B.; Tward, D. J.
Show abstract
Reconstructing neuronal morphology from large 3D microscopy volumes is essential for quantitative neuro-science but remains challenging due to noise, low contrast, and complex branching geometry. We present an automated neuron tracing method that formulates reconstruction as a sequential decision-making problem and trains a 3D convolutional policy via imitation learning. The key technical contribution is an online expert-action retrieval scheme that derives locally valid continuation directions directly from a gold-standard SWC tree, including at bifurcations. Combined with DAgger-style dataset aggregation, the policy is trained under its own state distribution without requiring handcrafted reward functions or a separate segmentation-to-skeleton postprocessing stage. We package the approach into an end-to-end tracing pipeline with optional path refinement operations and tools for quantitative evaluation and interactive editing. On the BigNeuron Gold166 benchmark, our method achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction accuracy, outperforming all competing challenge methods under both morphology-based aggregate metrics and geometric distance comparisons.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven fine-grained region discovery in the mouse brain with transformers 95%
- Automatic mapping of multiplexed social receptive fields by deep learning and GPU-accelerated 3D videography 95%
- Neural-physics adaptive reconstruction reveals 3D subcellular nanostructures over a large depth of field 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dense neuronal reconstruction through X-ray holographic nano-tomography 95%
- A large-scale, standardized physiological survey reveals higher order coding throughout the mouse visual cortex 94%
- A deep learning framework for inference of single-trial neural population dynamics from calcium imaging with sub-frame temporal resolution 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.