Back

Long-Term Functional and Histological Outcomes Following Sutureless Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Nerve Tape in Pigs

Tatarchuk, M. M.; Clizbe, D. R.; Browne, K. D.; Howard, S.; Ghenbot, Y.; Zager, E. L.; Cullen, D. K.; Burrell, J. C.

2026-08-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.29.741584 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Severe peripheral nerve injuries result in incomplete recovery despite neurorrhaphy. Microsurgical suturing is technically demanding, time-intensive, and may produce variable fascicular alignment. Nerve Tape is an FDA-approved sutureless device enabling rapid, reproducible nerve coaptation. This study compared Nerve Tape with epineurial microsuturing following common peroneal nerve transection in Yucatan minipigs. Over 12 months, both groups demonstrated reinnervation of the tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum brevis, representing proximal and distal muscle targets, respectively. Tibialis anterior recovery was comparable between groups. In contrast, Nerve Tape produced greater distal motor recovery in the extensor digitorum brevis, with approximately 1.8-fold higher compound muscle action potential amplitude and 74.3% versus 46.0% recovery compared with microsutures. Compound nerve action potential amplitudes recorded from the motor branch of the deep peroneal nerve were also greater with Nerve Tape, whereas conduction velocities were comparable. Histological analysis demonstrated preserved fascicular architecture distal to the repair in both groups, with no significant differences in axon count, mean myelinated axon diameter, or g-ratio in the terminal common peroneal nerve or its distal motor branch. Clinical use was demonstrated in a representative case with progressive recovery. Nerve Tape supported durable structural and functional recovery and improved distal motor reinnervation compared with microsuturing.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.