Back

Study of Principles Governing Epithelial Cell Clustering and Collective Motion In Vitro

Gou, J.; Potomkin, M.; Ingal, J. P.; Butenko, S.; Liu, W. F.; Plikus, M. V.; Alber, M.

2026-07-30 cell biology
10.64898/2026.07.29.741528 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In epithelial wounds, physically enlarged cells emerge along injury edges where they interact with regular-size cells during collective migration to repair tissue continuity. Although such large cells are often interpreted as migration leaders, recent observations suggest that regular-size cells can reciprocally influence them and that mixed-size cell clusters engage in distinct rotational motion before merging into confluent sheets. How cell size, polarity and adhesive coupling jointly control distinct collective migration modes remains unclear. Because many features of collective epithelial migration, including large and regular-size cell phenotypes, are conserved between in vivo and in vitro systems, here we developed a multi-scale computational model of interacting epithelial cells in two-dimensional culture with dynamic cell-substrate adhesion, cell-cell interactions, protrusion-based polarity, and contact-induced myosin redistribution as polarity regulator. We also explicitly modeled two functionally distinct cell states, featuring regular and large sizes respectively. Simulations showed that symmetric and asymmetric myosin redistribution at cell-cell junctions can produce stable cell contacts and persistent rotational motions by cell doublets. Intriguingly, in mixed-size cell clusters, straight translation can arise both from leader-like large cell and regular-size cell-mediated motion, whereas rotation emerges when large-cell-generated torque overcomes translation while cell-cell adhesion is maintained. Thus, collective migration mode depends on the balance among myosin-driven torque, regular-size cell-mediated translation, substrate coupling, and cell-cell adhesion. These modeling results suggest that collective epithelial migration can emerge in vitro from reciprocal biomechanical interactions between distinct cell states, rather than from leader-like cell behavior alone, and that such interactions can produce a predator-prey-like pursuit-escape mode of collective migration. Our model also provides a framework for investigating the biochemical and biomechanical regulation of collective cellular migration. It can be readily extended from in vitro to in vivo context and can incorporate the effects of substrate topology and soluble signaling factor-driven chemotaxis. Author summaryWhen epithelial cells repair a wound, they move as coordinated groups rather than as isolated individuals. Cells of different sizes may contribute in distinct but connected ways. We developed a computational model to examine how a large cell and neighboring regular-size cells move together. In the model, cells attach to the underlying surface and one another, form protrusions that set their direction, and redistribute the force-generating protein myosin after contact. We found that group motion depends on a balance among surface attachment, cell-cell adhesion, movement of regular-size cells toward the large cell, and myosin-driven turning of the large cell. Depending on this balance, a mixed-size cluster can travel along a nearly straight path or rotate persistently, exhibiting pursuit-and-escape-like interactions between the large cell and surrounding regular-size cells. Rotation occurs when the large cells turning effect outweighs the translational motion driven by regular-size cells, while cell-cell adhesion keeps the cluster together. Our results show that collective migration can emerge from reciprocal mechanical interactions between cells in different states, not only from a "leader" cell acting alone. The model also provides experimentally testable predictions for how cell size, adhesion, and internal myosin distribution shape cell cluster movement.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.