Back

Mixed effects modeling of the synergy between immune checkpoint and thrombin inhibitors in a preclinical mouse model of colon cancer

Cox, N.; Nayak, I.; Li, Z.; Das, J.

2026-08-04 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.07.29.741459 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, though it is still effective in only about 20-40% of patients. To increase the efficacy of ICB therapy, combinations of ICB antibodies such as anti-PD1 and anticoagulants (e.g., thrombin inhibitors) have been studied in preclinical mouse models and clinical trials. We developed a Bliss-type analysis to quantify the synergy between anti-PD1 and dabigatran etexilate using published tumor growth data from a mouse model. We then developed a minimal mechanistic computational model to quantitatively study the synergy between anti-PD1 and the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in a published study (Metelli et al.) of a preclinical mouse model of colon cancer. Our model included tumor cells, CD8+ T cells, and the pleiotropic cytokine TGF{beta}, whose production in platelets is influenced by thrombin, and described a potential mechanism of interplay among these components in the tumor microenvironment. We performed nonlinear mixed-effects modeling to capture mouse-to-mouse variation in tumor growth under different treatment conditions. The estimated parameter values pointed to several underlying mechanisms of synergy, including increased expansion of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment in the presence of anti-PD1 and dabigatran etexilate. These predictions can be further validated in future experiments. Thus, the combination of longitudinal tumor growth data, mechanistic population dynamics modeling, and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling can be used to study synergy between ICB and other drugs in controlling tumor growth.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.