Back

An alphabet of allostery: a transferable transfer entropy contact patterns predicts allosteric-site character and conformational rewiring

Hacisuleyman, A.

2026-08-01 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.29.741458 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Allostery is increasingly understood as the propagation of dynamic information through a protein, yet the computational descriptors of that flow are computed one structure at a time and carry no transferable, sequence-level prior. Here we build an alphabet of allostery: a dictionary of local contact words, short sequence windows anchored by three-to four-residue spatial cliques, each carrying a distribution of net Gaussian network model transfer entropy scores pooled over a non-redundant set of Protein Data Bank structures. The alphabet consists of 131,611,766 unique words drawn from 212,860,934 clique observations. Projecting any proteins sequence and structure onto this dictionary yields a per-residue allosteric track, net TE, source, sink, and switch channels, with no system-specific fitting. Validating against the Allosteric Database, annotated allosteric-site residues behave as transfer entropy sinks (information receivers): the sink channel discriminates sites from the rest of the protein with pooled ROC-AUC = 0.543 over 646,629 residues (permutation z = 19.1), an effect small in magnitude but overwhelmingly significant and robust to word-frequency leakage. The directional channels are mechanistically informative in a two-state experiment on nine canonical allosteric proteins: source residues predict the largest apo[->]holo conformational rewiring (meta-analytic Spearman {rho} = +0.106, positive in 7/9 proteins) while sink residues mark the most conformationally stable positions ({rho} = -0.105, 8/9). Sinks thus mark where allosteric signal is received and sources mark where it drives motion. Finally, we mine the most context-variable words into a compact, hydrophobic-enriched switch vocabulary that we propose as a design dictionary for engineering allosteric mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.