Subliminal Primes Bias the Spatial Locus of Involuntary Object Naming in a Two-Object Reflexive Imagery Task
Chulet, M.; Hamilda, J.; Rani, J.; Margabandhu, K.; Prasad, T. K.; Bosco, C. J.; Sampathkumar, S.; Victoria, M. M.; Sunderraj, E. S.; Rafi, R.; Jepegnanam, R. T.; Ninan, G. A.; Selvaganesan, S.; Prabhakar, A. T.
Show abstract
Certain conscious contents--such as the covert name of a viewed object--arise involuntarily and resist suppression, a phenomenon captured by the Reflexive Imagery Task (RIT). Whether a subliminal prime can bias which of two simultaneously present objects captures such an involuntary naming response has not been established. We adapted a two-object RIT into a self-contained, browser-based instrument. Thirty-eight adults (M age = 21.6 years, SD = 2.3; 26 female) viewed 24 object pairs and were instructed to fixate a central cross, to refrain from thinking of the objects names, and to click an object whenever its name intruded into awareness. On each trial a masked prime (17 ms, flanked by pattern masks) was either the exact name of one object (Exact Word Prime), a semantic associate of one object (Semantic Prime), or a neutral string (No Prime), defining a primed side per trial. A post-experiment debriefing confirmed that participants noticed the masks but none consciously perceived or could identify the prime words, indicating that the primes were subliminal. Analyses excluded 91 of 912 trials (10.0%) with more than five clicks. The priming effect was robust across measures: an omnibus comparison of clicks across conditions was significant (Friedman {chi}{superscript 2}(2) = 6.59, p = .037); within both prime conditions participants clicked the primed side more than the not-primed side (Exact Word, p = .039; Semantic, p = .005); and the primed-to-not-primed ratio exceeded parity by roughly 57-59% (Laplace-smoothed ratio {approx} 1.58; one-sample Wilcoxon p < .001 for each). A Bayesian Poisson generalized linear mixed model with random participant intercepts confirmed a credible primed-side advantage (incidence rate ratio = 1.72, 95% credible interval [1.57, 1.90]) that did not differ between prime types. No general left/right response bias emerged. An exploratory ight-side x Exact Word Prime interaction was inconsistent across model classes and is reported as hypothesis-generating. The findings indicate that subliminal lexical and semantic primes can steer the spatial locus of involuntary object naming.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Categorical bias as a crucial parameter in visual working memory: the effect of memory load and retention interval 92%
- Sensorimotor conflicts alter perceptual and action monitoring 92%
- Quantifying Aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Object-Centered Spatial Learning in Dynamic Contexts: History-Driven Distractor Suppression and Target Enhancement 93%
- Fractionating distraction: How past- and future-relevant distractors influence integrated decisions 93%
- Temporal segmentation and 'look ahead' simulation: Physical events structure visual perception of intuitive physics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective visibility report is facilitated by conscious predictions only 93%
- Investigating the role of sensorimotor spatial dependencies in shaping conscious access to virtual 3D objects 92%
- Reverse-breaking CFS (rev-bCFS): Disentangling conscious and unconscious effects by measuring suppression and dominance times during continuous flash suppression 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.