How do patients move within the Norwegian hospital system? A comprehensive ward- and hospital-level network analysis
de Blasio, B. F.; Scalia Tomba, G.
Show abstract
ABSTRACT Patient movements within and between hospitals create networks that can facilitate the spread of nosocomial infections. Many relevant pathogens have long-lasting carriage, allowing colonised patients to move through multiple wards across successive admissions, thereby indirectly linking wards. Yet system-wide ward-level analyses based on individual patient trajectories remain rare, even though they can reveal important features for understanding and simulating the system. We analysed ward- and hospital-level networks using individual patient trajectories from the Norwegian Patient Registry (3.6 million registrations), covering hospital care for ~55% of the population over one year (2012). We characterised the global network structure and, at ward level, calculated multiple centralisation measures and assessed percolation-based connectivity. From these, we identified central wards using directed K-core decomposition combined with Gaussian mixture modelling clustering. Analyses were performed separately for inpatients and all patients, and extended by linking episodes across increasing time gaps to explore how assumptions about episode continuity influence inferred connectivity. Various patient-based statistics were also analysed. Patient movements generated sparse, regionally structured networks with clear core-periphery organisation. Inflow K-cores were larger than outflow cores, with central wards dominated by major hospital referral specialities and medical wards acting as key entry and exit points. Community structure differed by patient type: all-patient networks were largely locally contained, whereas inpatient networks spanned hospitals and regions. Temporal linking increased hub dominance only in all-patient networks, while inpatient structure remained comparatively stable. Dynamic diffusion simulations and a real outbreak analysis independently supported the identified structural backbone, demonstrating that central network hubs also represent the dominant potential pathways of patient-mediated spread under simplified transmission assumptions. The results reveal a robust hierarchical organisational structure of patient movements that can help prioritise surveillance, while underscoring the need for pathogen-specific epidemiological and contextual data for predictive modelling.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-Level Associations in the Spread of Co-Circulating Respiratory Viruses: A Multi-Method Statistical Investigation Using Incidence Data 93%
- Gaps in mobility data and implications for modelling epidemic spread: a scoping review and simulation study 92%
- Responsible modelling: Unit testing for infectious disease epidemiology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An algorithm to build synthetic temporal contact networks based on close-proximity interactions data 93%
- A network modelling approach to assess non-pharmaceutical disease controls in a worker population: An application to SARS-CoV-2 93%
- Cluster detection with random neighbourhood covering: application to invasive Group A Streptococcal disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing societal impacts of SARS-CoV-2 interventions through subnational implementation 92%
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 92%
- Quantifying antibiotic impact on within-host dynamics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance in hospitalized patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions to control nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study 91%
- Quantifying the impact of hospital catchment area definitions on hospital admissions forecasts: COVID-19 in England, September 2020 - April 2021 90%
- Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 admissions in England at the local level 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.