Impact of Code Stroke Activation and Warfarin Use on Time to Anticoagulation Reversal in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Implications For Quality Improvement
Tan, H.; Carrillo, M.; Dench, D.; Chen, J.; Shafie, M.; Yu, W.
Show abstract
Background Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating type of stroke but lacks the established time-critical treatment guidelines available for acute ischemic stroke. This study investigated the impact of Code Stroke activation and warfarin use on anticoagulation reversal times to identify opportunities for quality improvement. Methods We retrospectively assessed patients with anticoagulation-associated ICH admitted to our medical center between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2025. Patients with warfarin- or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated ICH were identified from our ICH clinical trial screening log, Vizient, and AHA's Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Code Stroke activation, warfarin or DOAC use, anticoagulation reversal times, causes of delay, and clinical outcomes at hospital discharge were analyzed. Results Of 892 ICH admissions, 50 patients had confirmed anticoagulation-associated ICH. Among those who underwent reversed at our center (n=34), Code Stroke activation (n=24) significantly reduced door-to-CT time (16.5 [12.8-22.0] vs 172.5 [49.0-261.5] minutes, p <0.001), reversal agent order-to-needle time (37.5 [24.7-56.9] vs 57.0 [39.0-85.0] minutes, p <0.001), and door-to-treatment (DTT) time (64 [48-98] vs 277 [159-305] minutes, p <0.001) compared to non-activation (n=10). Conversely, warfarin use was associated with higher international normalized ratios (INR) (2.7 [2.2-3.6] vs 1.3 [1.2-1.9], p =0.003) and significantly longer DTT time (95 [51-108] vs 64 [48-77] minutes, p =0.007). Primary DTT delays stemmed from the absence of a time-critical treatment protocol, weight-based dosing for 4F-PCC, waiting for INR results, and a lack of Code Stroke activation for patients with mild symptoms, trauma or unexplained unresponsiveness. Conclusions Our findings suggest that Code Stroke activation for all suspected cases of ICH, a time-critical emergency department algorithm targeting a DTT time of less than 60 minutes, and immediate anticoagulation reversal with fixed-dose 4F-PCC without waiting for INR results may optimize the acute management of anticoagulation-associated ICH.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 97%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 95%
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 95%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 94%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 94%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 93%
- High blood viscosity in acute ischemic stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Risk Assessment Model Predicts Major Bleeding Risk at Admission in Medical Inpatients 93%
- Coagulation factor XII, XI, and VIII activity levels and secondary events after first ischemic stroke 93%
- Optimal adherence thresholds for oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning and population administrative data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.