Back

A dynamically coupled kinetic model for Arterial Spin Labeling: Enhancing the reliability of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid renewal quantification in vivo

Ye, Q.

2026-08-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.28.741371 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) provides a valuable non-invasive tool for investigating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. While existing generalized kinetic models provide a useful analytical framework, incorporating explicit fluid mass-conservation constraints may improve the reliability of ventricular CSF quantification. We developed and validated a physics-constrained kinetic model that assumes a constant ventricular volume, under which the volumetric influx and efflux rates are balanced. Under this assumption, the localized CSF renewal rate (f) is modeled as a distinct washout process that acts jointly with intrinsic CSF T1 relaxation R1,CSF, yielding an effective decay rate Reff = R1,CSF + f, providing a more mechanistically interpretable description of the post-arrival signal decay. The model was further tailored to the global inversion physics of the FAIR (Flow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery) sequence and incorporates an explicit zero-clamped pre-arrival boundary condition. When applied to an in vivo preclinical dataset, the proposed model, improved fitting stability and removed the finite-bolus truncation observed in the raw conventional model. Compared with the conventional model, the proposed model showed significantly improved goodness-of-fit (R2 = 0.95 {+/-} 0.05 vs. 0.82 {+/-} 0.06, p < 0.001) and a lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC = 94.96 {+/-} 5.83 vs. 106.93 {+/-} 2.50, p < 0.001), suggesting it provides a more adequate and efficient representation of CSF dynamics. The proposed model yielded CSF dynamics estimates 14.70% higher than those obtained with the conventional model, with a mean ventricular CSF renewal time of 4.01 {+/-} 0.97 min and a renewal-equivalent volumetric flow rate of 0.97 {+/-} 0.41 {micro}L/min. The resulting estimates might be interpreted as localized, ASL-derived renewal metrics rather than direct measurements of net CSF production.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.