Back

An Open-Source Magnetofluorescence Imaging Platform forPlate-Scale Screening of Magnetic Field Effects in LiveBacteria

Lodesani, A.; Ross, B. L.; Sridharan, V.; Aiello, C. D.

2026-07-29 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.28.741305 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Magnetic field effects (MFEs) in biological systems are typically small and experimentally challenging to measure reproducibly across large sample populations. Existing approaches to measure such effects often rely on low-throughput microscopy or custom-built magnetic stimulation systems that provide limited control over magnetic field geometry, synchronization, or experimental automation. Here, we present an open-source magnetofluorescence imaging platform designed for bacterial plate-scale screening of MFEs in live colonies. The instrument integrates a programmable three-axis vector electromagnet, synchronized fluorescence excitation and imaging, and integrated acquisition software with per-frame metadata logging on a hardware-synchronized data acquisition card. An extensive calibration procedure enables accurate generation of arbitrary magnetic field vectors, while synchronized triggering ensures deterministic alignment between field application, illumination, and image acquisition. The system images an entire 100 mm Petri dish in a single acquisition. Typical experiments monitor hundreds of bacterial colonies simultaneously over multi-hour acquisition sequences. Control software, calibration routines, mechanical design files, and acquisition workflows are provided openly to facilitate replication. Instrument performance is demonstrated through detection of magnetic field-dependent fluorescence changes in E. coli expressing the engineered magnetosensitive fluorescent protein MagLOV2. This instrument provides a flexible and scalable platform for high-throughput magnetobiology, synthetic biology, and quantum biology experiments.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.