Back

Thalamocortical orchestration of human theory of mind

Lu, R.; Davidson, E.; Miller-Smith, J.; Lyu, D.; Lusk, Z.; Kundu, P.; Doyon, J.; Chai, X. J.; Bernhardt, B.; Turner, G. R.; Spreng, R. N.

2026-07-31 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.28.741302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reasoning about others thoughts or beliefs is central to human social behavior. This ability, known as theory of mind (ToM), has been primarily attributed to cortical regions of the default network (DN). However, whether and how subcortical structures, particularly the thalamus, contribute to this high-level computation remains unknown. Here, we investigated human thalamocortical dynamics during a naturalistic ToM movie watching condition, taking a rare dual-modality approach by combining high-field 7T fMRI and intracranial stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). Across both modalities, ToM events reliably activated the DN, whereas the thalamus lacked canonical local activation. Despite this absence of local activation, the thalamus shared ToM-related representational structure and exhibited enhanced bidirectional interactions with the DN during mentalizing across methods. Crucially, sEEG revealed that the thalamus coordinated DN activity via cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), whereby thalamic low-frequency phase unidirectionally modulated DN high-frequency activity. Furthermore, the strength of thalamic-DN PAC predicted both the activity magnitude and the representational quality of ToM-related information within the dorsomedial DN subsystem. Together, these findings identify the human thalamus as a regulatory hub that gates DN computations during ToM without exhibiting observable localized activity, revealing a previously unrecognized mechanism by which thalamic dynamics coordinate high-level social cognition in humans.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.