Back

Dissecting the phenotypic and genetic determinants of maize-bean interactions in intercropping

Vazeux-Blumental, N.; Palaffre, C.; Brezeanu, C.; Brezeanu, P.; Lagardere, B.; Bauland, C.; Burridge, J.; Affortit, P.; Grondin, A.; Rossato, M.; Benazzo, A.; Mary-Huard, T.; Moreau, L.; papa, R.; Bellucci, E.; Bitocchi, E.; Servalli, F.; Laplaze, L.; Manicacci, D.; Tenaillon, M. I.

2026-07-28 genetics
10.64898/2026.07.28.741233 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LICereal-legume intercropping is a cornerstone of agroecological systems because interactions between species can enhance agroecosystem resilience. Yet, the mechanisms underlying these interactions remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we investigated the maize-bean association under low-input conditions. C_LIO_LIWe conducted a two-year intercropping experiment with 200 climbing bean lines grown alongside three maize landraces in France and Romania. We evaluated bean phenotypic responses above- and below-ground to 3 maize landraces, treated as distinct biotic environments (E). Direct and indirect genetic effects were assessed by mapping bean and maize phenotypic traits onto the bean genome (G), with G x E interactions tested using contrasts among maize landraces. C_LIO_LICompetitive interactions dominated, maize acting as the stronger competitor. Maize landraces created distinct biotic environments affecting bean traits. Best-performing partners varied across experimental fields, with no evidence of bean local adaptation. The most productive and balanced mixtures were obtained with the traditionally intercropped maize landrace. Genome-wide association analyses identified loci underlying direct and indirect genetic effects, including candidate genes associated with neighbor perception. C_LIO_LIThese findings reveal the genetic complexity of maize-bean interactions and highlight competitive tolerance in bean and reduced aggressiveness in maize as key traits for improving cereal-legume intercrop performance. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.