Back

Comparison of hiPSC-derived hepatic organoids and liver-on-a-chip systems reveal microenvironment-driven maturation

Tamargo Rubio, I.; Krempel, T.; Palasantzas, V. E. J. M.; Green, B.; Weijer, G. D. L.; Moerkens, R.; van der Woude, C.; van IJzendoorn, S.; Touw, D. J.; Hoogerland, J. A.; Withoff, S.; Fu, J.

2026-07-29 cell biology
10.64898/2026.07.28.741157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human liver organoids (HLOs) and liver-on-a-chip (LoC) systems are emerging as physiologically relevant human models for studying liver function, disease, and drug metabolism, often in combination with human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived tissues. However, hiPSC-derived models often display batch-to-batch variation and incomplete maturation, and the contribution of microfluidic flow to hepatic maturation remains insufficiently characterized. Here, we developed a cryopreservable and scalable workflow to generate hiPSC-derived hepatic organoids that can be directly matured to either static HLOs or LoC systems, enabling matched comparison of both platforms. Transcriptomic and functional characterization revealed progressive hepatic maturation during organoid differentiation, including increased expression of liver-specific metabolic pathways, enhanced albumin secretion, and increased CYP3A4 activity. Compared to mature HLOs, LoCs exposed to continuous microfluidic flow exhibited transcriptomic profiles suggesting further maturation, with increased enrichment of pathways related to lipid metabolism, xenobiotic metabolism, transport, and tissue organization. These findings demonstrate that microfluidic perfusion promotes hepatic metabolic specialization compared to static organoid culture while maintaining donor-specific characteristics. Together, this study establishes a robust hiPSC-derived LoC platform and highlights the potential of flow-based systems for improved modeling of human liver physiology, disease mechanisms, and drug responses.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.