Back

Scale-dependent spatial organisation of action observation network responses to hand actions and emotional faces

Haruki, Y.; Yamaguchi, R.; Ogawa, K.

2026-07-30 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.28.741155 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human social perception relies on multiple visual signals, including object-directed actions and emotional facial expressions. It remains unclear whether responses to these signals converge within action-observation regions and whether apparent convergence depends on the spatial scale of analysis. We scanned 39 healthy human adults during two block-design fMRI tasks, hand action observations contrasted with paper-tube controls, and emotional expression observations contrasted with neutral faces. Using independently defined meta-analytic action observation network (AON) ROIs in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), we analysed responses at whole-brain, ROI-average, and AON-constrained voxelwise scales. Whole-brain overlap between the two contrasts was localised primarily to the left lateral occipitotemporal extrastriate cortex, outside the AON. At the regional ROI-average scale, the IFG showed positive responses to both contrasts, whereas the IPL and pSTS showed opposing task preferences. Crucially, regional IFG co-engagement did not imply that the same voxels responded to both contrasts. Suprathreshold voxelwise overlap within the AON was virtually absent, and individual-level analysis revealed a small but reliable posterior displacement of hand action relative to emotional face within IFG. These findings show that spatial convergence between hand and emotion observation responses depends on the scale of analysis. The same IFG region can be engaged by both stimulus domains while retaining distinct local response topographies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.