Integrating animal experience into state-switching habitat selection models
Dejeante, R.; Kuperus, A.; Lewis, M. A.; Fryxell, J. M.
Show abstract
Movement models often assume that animal decisions depend on perceived environmental conditions. However, optimal foraging and cognition theory predict that accumulated experiences should drive changes in animal motivation and decision-making. Here, we propose a mechanistic framework that models state-switching habitat selection as a history-dependent process, where internal states, such as fear or energy, emerge as latent variables accumulating through environmental exposure. Simulations showed that our model accurately recovers memory timescales and cumulative effects of environmental exposure on behavioural switching that would be undetected by existing state-switching habitat selection models. Applied to woodland caribou, it reveals that an individual integrates predation risk experienced over the previous 15 days, but food intake over only 2 days, when deciding to remain or leave an area. Our model advances perspectives on movement ecology by quantifying how accumulated experiences shape changes in motivation driving animal movement decisions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multistate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck approach for practical estimation of movement and resource selection around central places 97%
- Mitigating pseudoreplication and bias in resource selection functions with autocorrelation-informed weighting 96%
- Integrated Movement Models for Individual Tracking and Species Distribution Data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel step selection analyses on energy landscapes reveal how linear features alter migrations of soaring birds 96%
- A model-based hypothesis framework to define and estimate the diel niche via the 'Diel.Niche' R package 94%
- Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: Efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.