Back

Genomic alterations enable BRCA1 methylation loss and promoter bypass to drive resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Xu, L.; Nesic, K.; Beard, S.; Simmons, J.; Lu, X.; Vandenberg, C. J.; Hoyte, S. M.; Jaradi, B.; Lim, R.; Geissler, F.; Edwards, S. L.; Vissers, J.; Papenfuss, A. T.; Grimmond, S.; Pearson, J. V.; Scott, C. L.; Wakefield, M. J.; Waddell, N.; Kondrashova, O.

2026-07-30 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.07.28.740856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BRCA1 promoter methylation predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, yet therapeutic resistance is common and mechanistically unresolved. Using long-read direct DNA sequencing of patient-derived xenografts and cell lines, we resolved BRCA1 methylation at single-molecule resolution with structural and transcriptomic analyses. We revealed two convergent PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance mechanisms, validated in patient tumors. First, focal, allele-specific loss of BRCA1 methylation arose through local cis-acting genomic alterations, instead of global epigenetic reprogramming. Engineered in cis sequence alterations near the methylated BRCA1 promoter were sufficient to induce methylation loss, restore homologous recombination, and confer resistance. Similar associations were observed across the genome, suggesting this mechanism extends beyond BRCA1. Second, BRCA1 expression was restored despite intact promoter methylation via structural variant-mediated promoter bypass or alternative transcription initiation. Together, these findings redefine BRCA1 methylation loss as a locus-restricted process and reveal multiple routes by which tumors escape PARP inhibitor therapy. Statement of SignificanceWe show that high-grade serous ovarian cancers can restore BRCA1 expression after therapy through multiple genomic mechanisms, including local methylation loss and promoter bypass, thereby re-establishing homologous recombination and driving PARP inhibitor resistance. These findings challenge reliance on BRCA1 methylation alone as a predictive biomarker and support rational combination therapies for more durable responses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.