Genotype-Phenotype Correlations Identify Phenotypic Differences in Sarcomere Mutation-Positive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the NHLBI HCM Registry
Goel, A.; Chan, J.; Grace, C.; Thomson, K. L.; Kim, D.-Y.; Desvigne-Nickens, P.; Kolm, P.; DiMarco, J. P.; Desai, M. Y.; Kwong, R. Y.; Ho, C. Y.; Weintraub, W. S.; Neubauer, S.; Kramer, C. M.; Watkins, H. C.
Show abstract
Background: Previous studies of genotype-phenotype correlations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have presented inconsistent conclusions, potentially reflecting small studies and non-uniform phenotyping. Objectives: We aimed to identify genotype-phenotype correlations in sarcomeric variant-positive HCM cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and adverse outcome data in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) HCM Registry. Methods: Of 2750 overall patients, 915 sarcomeric variant-positive ones were subgrouped by genotype. CMR measures of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, fibrosis and function, and adverse events, were compared. Findings were meta-analyzed with prior studies from systematic review. Results: Patients with pathogenic variants in thick-filament genes had greater hypertrophy than those in thin-filament genes - maximal LV wall thickness (maxLVWT) (21.7 {+/-} 5.0 vs. 20.0 {+/-} 4.4mm, P<0.01) and indexed LV mass (81.9 {+/-} 26.0 vs. 71.7 {+/-} 13.3g/m2, P<0.001). Of the former, MYBPC3 carriers had greater maxLVWT than MYH7 carriers (22.2 {+/-} 5.2 vs. 20.9 {+/-} 4.5mm, P<0.01) but lower LV ejection fraction (63.1 {+/-} 8.4 vs. 65.3 {+/-} 8.4%, P<0.001). Findings remained significant after covariate adjustment and meta-analysis. 23 (~1%) patients had >1 disease-linked variants with only 3 (~0.11%) carrying >1 pathogenic variants. MYBPC3 carriers had lower risk of a multiple event composite than MYH7 carriers. Conclusions: In the largest CMR-based study to date, we identified significant phenotypic differences that characterize disease-gene subgroups and resolved prior discrepancies through systematic review and meta-analysis. However, carriage of >1 sarcomeric variants did not contribute much to variation in phenotypic severity in the general HCM population due to its rarity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Right Ventricular Sarcomere Contractile Depression and the Role of Thick Filament Activation in Human Heart Failure with Pulmonary Hypertension 96%
- Leveraging a genetic proxy to investigate the effects of lifelong cardiac sodium channel blockade 95%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Left ventricular mass and global wall thickness – prognostic utility and characterization of left ventricular hypertrophy 95%
- Altered Intercellular Communication and Extracellular Matrix Signaling as a Potential Disease Mechanism in Human Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Two-hit mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction combining diet-induced obesity and renin-mediated hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 95%
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism Reduces Atrial Arrhythmias Post-Cardiac Surgery and Attenuates Atrial Stress Responses to Cardioplegic Arrest 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for primary prevention of heart failure 94%
- Genetic Architecture of Heart Failure with Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
- Cardiomyocyte Contractile Impairment in Heart Failure Results from Reduced BAG3-mediated Sarcomeric Protein Turnover 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.