Solanum americanum Bs2 and ZAR1 homologs recognize Xanthomonas euvesicatoria effectors essential for infection.
Koh, Y.; Jo, H.; Kim, J.; Cho, H.; Kim, I.; Kim, W.; Kim, C. M.; Sohn, K. H.; Segonzac, C.
Show abstract
Multiple recognition events of pathogen-secreted effectors by immune receptors confer robust disease resistance in plants. Understanding the underlying mechanisms facilitates the discovery and deployment of valuable resistance genes for crop protection. Xanthomonas euvesicatoria causes devastating bacterial spot disease in solanaceous crops but cannot infect the wild relative Solanum americanum. Here, we identified X. euvesicatoria type III effectors (T3Es) that induce cell death in S. americanum when transiently expressed in leaf. By quantifying immune responses of the S. americanum SP2273 accession to X. euvesicatoria multiple-T3E knockout mutants, we demonstrated that at least nine T3Es (AvrBs2, XopAP, XopAU, XopE1, XopJ3, XopM, XopN, XopX, and XopZ1) collectively contribute to effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Among these, AvrBs2 and XopJ3 were the primary drivers of ETI, eliciting robust cell death and defense gene expression when naturally delivered into plant cells. We next generated S. americanum lines concomitantly edited at the corresponding immune receptor loci, SaBs2 and SaZAR1 (SP2273-bz). Genetic complementation of SP2273-bz confirmed that AvrBs2 and XopJ3 are specifically recognized by each of the four SaBs2 homologs and by SaZAR1, respectively. Moreover, enhanced growth of X. euvesicatoria on the characterized SP2273-bz line indicated that both effectors are required for bacterial multiplication in S. americanum. Together, our findings provide a framework for understanding the mechanisms of ETI-mediated resistance and establish a genetic foundation for resistance breeding in solanaceous crops.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectors from a Bacterial Vector-Borne Pathogen Exhibit Diverse Subcellular Localization, Expression Profiles and Manipulation of Plant Defense 97%
- The Zymoseptoria tritici avirulence factor AvrStb6 accumulates in hyphae close to stomata and triggers a wheat defense response hindering fungal penetration 96%
- ER bodies are induced by Pseudomonas syringae and negatively regulate immunity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- AvrE1 and HopR1 from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae are additively required for full virulence on kiwifruit 97%
- Conditional gene expression reveals stage-specific functions of the unfolded protein response in the Ustilago maydis/maize pathosystem 96%
- A Jacalin-like lectin-domain-containing protein of Sclerospora graminicola act as an apoplastic virulence effector in plant-oomycete interactions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Arabidopsis WRR4A and WRR4B paralogous NLR proteins both confer recognition of multiple Albugo candida effectors 97%
- A highly polymorphic effector protein promotes fungal virulence through suppression of plant-associated Actinobacteria 96%
- The Ralstonia solanacearum effector RipAV targets Plant U-box proteins and induces proteasomal-dependent degradation of BIK1 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Related PP2C phosphatases Pic3 and Pic12 negatively regulate immunity in tomato to Pseudomonas syringae 97%
- Knocking out SOBIR1 in Nicotiana benthamiana abolishes functionality of transgenic receptor-like protein Cf-4 96%
- A CRISPR/Cas9 mediated 53 kb deletion of the NRC4 gene cluster of tomato does not affect bacterial flagellin-triggered immunity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of novel basil downy mildew resistance genes using de novo comparative transcriptomics 95%
- Candidate effector proteins from the maize tar spot pathogen Phyllachora maydis localize to diverse plant cell compartments 95%
- Prophylactic Application of Tailocins Prevents Infection by Pseudomonas syringae 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.