Back

Loss of GdpP function in Staphylococcus aureus confers β-lactam-specific antibiotic tolerance and promotes invasive infection

Chatterjee, S. S.; Hayatnagarkar, V. D.; Giulieri, S.; Poon, R.; Bose, S.; Parsons, J. B.; Tong, S.; Fowler, V. G.; Howden, B. P.

2026-08-24 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.27.740951 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of antibiotic tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus reduces antibiotic efficacy by allowing bacterial survival despite prolonged antibiotic exposure, the molecular basis of which remains poorly understood. Moreover, the phenotypic indistinguishability of tolerant isolates in antimicrobial susceptibility testing impedes effective diagnosis and therapy. Increased concentration of the second-messenger, cyclic-di-AMP (CDA), has recently been implicated in tolerance to {beta}-lactams as well as other cell-wall-reactive antibiotics. Using the ScanLag assay, Tolerance-Disk test, and traditional methodologies and employing isogenic mutagenized strains, we demonstrate that loss of GdpP function, a phosphodiesterase that hydrolyzes CDA, confers tolerance specifically to {beta}-lactam antibiotics independent of their class. The extent of {beta}-lactam tolerance correlated directly with the intracellular CDA concentration and inversely with the inhibition of bacterial cell-wall synthesis. {Delta}gdpP mutants caused higher mortality than wild-type strains in the Galleria mellonella infection model upon {beta}-lactam treatment, suggesting GdpP-mediated tolerance could lead to {beta}-lactam treatment failure. Large-scale within-host evolution analysis demonstrated that MRSA and MSSA strains isolated from patients acquire GdpP loss-of-function mutations during invasive infections but not during nasal carriage. Overall, this study highlights the clinical relevance of gdpP mutations, frequently selected in persistent S. aureus infections, as key mediators that could promote treatment failure due to {beta}-lactam tolerance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.