Back

Cross-Species Efficacy of Combinatorial Gene Therapy for Osteoarthritis and Correction of Neuro-Inflammatory Pain Mechanisms

Secor, E.; Wang, J.; Dou, Z.; Yan, J.; Majano, C.; Woodman, M.; Ruiz, O.; Al Azaat, J.; Crosby, D.; Cela, R.; Pownder, S.; Engiles, J. B.; Palmer, D.; Jiang, M.; Leynes, C.; Yaman, I.; Jeong, M.; Sponder, G.; Plutziki, S.; Yuva, L.; Veeragavan, S.; Ray, R. S.; Wythe, J. D.; Arenkiel, B. R.; Chen, R.; Worley, K. C.; Consortium, R.-J.; Ng, P.; Suzuki, M.; Guse, K.; Bae, Y.; Haelterman, N. A.; Reesink, H.; Lee, B.

2026-07-28 systems biology
10.64898/2026.07.27.740924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability, which lacks disease-modifying treatment. Given the complex multi-tissue and multifactorial drivers behind disease progression, effective treatments will require simultaneously targeting several mechanisms underlying joint degeneration and pain. Here, we developed and evaluated a combinatorial gene therapy, consisting of a high-capacity adenoviral vector carrying two therapeutic genes to target distinct pathological mechanisms: inflammation (IL-1Ra) and chondrocyte health (PRG4). Intra-articular delivery of this treatment improved functional, structural, and pain outcomes in murine and equine osteoarthritis models. In addition, treatment normalized inflammatory environments in joint tissues, as well as in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) known to harbor joint-innervating sensory neurons. Moreover, gene therapy reversed OA-induced molecular signatures of neural hyperexcitability, suggesting amelioration of peripheral sensitization. Collectively, these findings support combinatorial gene therapy as a promising treatment for osteoarthritis, while identifying neuroinflammatory signatures for correction of disease progression and pain. One Sentence SummaryA single intra-articular injection of a combinatorial gene therapy slows OA progression and reduces pain in small and large animal models.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.