Back

A mobile optical coherence microscope for studying aquatic organisms in- and outside the laboratory

Wang, L.; Davis, S.; Quilitz, T.; Beavis, T.; Bonadonna, M.; Lamprousi, M.; Montanari, R.; Ruperti, F.; Stokkermans, A.; Wiegand, T.; Witte, V. A.; Ortiz, A. G.; Dorrity, M.; Siemens, J.; Musser, J.; Arendt, D.; Leisch, N.; Vincent, F.; Ikmi, A.; Prevedel, R.

2026-07-28 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.27.740915 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-resolution, three-dimensional imaging of live organisms has largely depended on laboratory-bound microscopes, limiting quantitative analysis of morphology and dynamics to species that survive transport and thrive under lab-controlled conditions. Here we present a mobile optical coherence microscopy (OCM) platform that overcomes this constraint, delivering [~]2.5 {micro}m axial resolution, label-free, volumetric imaging of live aquatic organisms in both laboratory and remote field environments. We demonstrate the platform across a broad range of aquatic organisms from the lab and field, spanning multiple phyla - including cnidarians, poriferans, annelids, arthropods and echinoderms - resolving internal anatomy, tissue boundaries and organismal morphology at micrometer scale without fixation, fluorescent labeling, or specialized sample preparation. High-speed acquisition, with up to 250 kHz A-line rate and 7.7 Hz volume rate, further enabled morphodynamic imaging of live biological processes, including cellular aggregate motility, embryonic cell division, and organ-level peristaltic dynamics in intact, living animals. To demonstrate field deployability, the platform was operated during the EMBL TREC pan-European expedition, enabling on-site, label-free imaging of marine organisms and plankton immediately upon collection. By decoupling high-resolution volumetric imaging from fixed laboratory settings, mobile OCM opens a path toward field-ready quantitative morphological and dynamic phenotyping of aquatic life.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.