International patient safety learning systems: a qualitative key informant interview study with safety-critical industry experts
Qasem, J.; Wood, F.; Edwards, A.; Carson-Stevens, A.
Show abstract
Background: Patient safety learning systems operate primarily at the national level, yet the potential for international sharing of safety intelligence remains largely unrealised. Other safety-critical industries, including civil aviation, nuclear power, and rail, have developed international incident reporting and learning systems whose design principles may offer transferable insights for healthcare. Objective: To explore the views and experiences of safety-critical industry experts regarding the purpose, key functions and features, transferability, barriers, enablers, and incident priorities of a potential international patient safety learning system. Design: Qualitative phenomenological study using semi-structured key informant interviews analysed with the five-stage framework analysis method. Participants: Eleven international experts purposively sampled from safety-critical industries (healthcare, civil aviation, maritime, and railway) across six countries. Interviews were conducted by telephone or internet-based audio call between May and September 2019. Results: Seven themes were identified: (1) purpose of an international patient safety learning system; (2) key functions; (3) key features; (4) transferability of learning; (5) enablers; (6) barriers; and (7) patient safety incident types appropriate for international sharing. Rare and emerging event detection emerged as the most distinctive value of an international system, a capability that cannot be replicated at national level. Critical functions included robust feedback loops, multidisciplinary analytical capability, and actionable recommendations. Key barriers, including blame culture, inter-organisational mistrust, and cross-border privacy legislation, were each amplified at the international level relative to their national-level equivalents. Conclusions: This study provides the first cross-industry qualitative account of design requirements for an international healthcare patient safety learning system, highlighting transferable lessons from established industries alongside healthcare-specific challenges that require bespoke solutions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 94%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 92%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 92%
- The experiences, challenges, and enablers for promoting interprofessional education among medical students: A Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has been the impact of Covid-19 on Safety Culture? A case study from a large metropolitan teaching hospital. 94%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 90%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 93%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 92%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 90%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.