Back

International patient safety learning systems: a qualitative key informant interview study with safety-critical industry experts

Qasem, J.; Wood, F.; Edwards, A.; Carson-Stevens, A.

2026-07-28 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.27.26359014 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Patient safety learning systems operate primarily at the national level, yet the potential for international sharing of safety intelligence remains largely unrealised. Other safety-critical industries, including civil aviation, nuclear power, and rail, have developed international incident reporting and learning systems whose design principles may offer transferable insights for healthcare. Objective: To explore the views and experiences of safety-critical industry experts regarding the purpose, key functions and features, transferability, barriers, enablers, and incident priorities of a potential international patient safety learning system. Design: Qualitative phenomenological study using semi-structured key informant interviews analysed with the five-stage framework analysis method. Participants: Eleven international experts purposively sampled from safety-critical industries (healthcare, civil aviation, maritime, and railway) across six countries. Interviews were conducted by telephone or internet-based audio call between May and September 2019. Results: Seven themes were identified: (1) purpose of an international patient safety learning system; (2) key functions; (3) key features; (4) transferability of learning; (5) enablers; (6) barriers; and (7) patient safety incident types appropriate for international sharing. Rare and emerging event detection emerged as the most distinctive value of an international system, a capability that cannot be replicated at national level. Critical functions included robust feedback loops, multidisciplinary analytical capability, and actionable recommendations. Key barriers, including blame culture, inter-organisational mistrust, and cross-border privacy legislation, were each amplified at the international level relative to their national-level equivalents. Conclusions: This study provides the first cross-industry qualitative account of design requirements for an international healthcare patient safety learning system, highlighting transferable lessons from established industries alongside healthcare-specific challenges that require bespoke solutions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.