Back

A Versatile, Spectrophotometer-Based, Quantitative, Visual, Bias-Reducing Method for Human Skin Colour Measurement and Classification

Dadzie, O. E.; Sturm, R. A.; Ali, S.; Fajuyigbe, D.; Petit, A.; Jablonski, N.; Yu, G.

2026-07-31 dermatology
10.64898/2026.07.27.26358883 medRxiv
Show abstract

We evaluated an inexpensive portable hand-held spectrophotometer for skin colour measurement and classification. Under standardised conditions, skin reflectance and colorimetric data were collected from 40 participants of diverse ancestral backgrounds at three anatomical sites: forehead (FH), right posterior forearm (FA), and right upper inner arm (RUA). Demographic and ancestral data, Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype classification, standardised iPhone 13 images, and visual and device-based skin colour matches were also obtained. Participants spanned the five-point EHSCS scale; visually matched Pantone SkinTone colours numbered 25 for FH, 33 for FA, and 28 for RUA. ITA values derived from colorimetric data were used to generate site-specific classifications using the five-point EHSCS, seven-point ITA scale incorporating Del Bino categories, and ten-point MST categories defined by Ulrich or Lipnick. This versatile spectrophotometer-based approach supports affordable, reproducible, race-, ethnicity-, and ancestry-independent skin colour measurement and classification across multiple scales for dermatologists and other users.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
JID Innovations
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Experimental Dermatology
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
British Journal of Dermatology
◐ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.5%
7
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Diagnostics
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
9
eClinicalMedicine
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
10
Human Genomics
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Translational Vision Science & Technology
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
○ 120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
Behavior Research Methods
○ 30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
JAMA Network Open
● 130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Journal of Biophotonics
○ 16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
20
Nature Medicine
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Biomedical Optics
● 28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Photochemistry and Photobiology
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
25
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
● 466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.