Genetically nominated cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic features are not preferentially responsive to weight-loss and cardiometabolic interventions
Hsueh, C.-Y.; Chen, K.-T.; Tan, B. C.
Show abstract
Background Substantial cardiovascular and kidney risk persists after successful weight loss. Whether features that genetics implicates in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) disease show larger short-term responses to weight-loss and cardiometabolic interventions than other features is unknown. Methods Across four molecular layers (proteome, transcriptome, methylome, metabolome), we applied layer-specific cis-Mendelian randomization with colocalization or summary-data shared-signal filtering against eight CKM genome-wide association studies. Within 13 omics-by-intervention analyses (diet, bariatric surgery, empagliflozin, behavioral weight loss), we compared response magnitude between nominated and adequately-instrumented non-nominated features using rank-based Cliff's {delta} ; methylation was baseline-variance-matched and directional analyses exploratory. Results Here we show genetic nomination is not consistently associated with larger observed response magnitude: estimates are small (|{delta}| < 0.08 in all 13; median |{delta}| = 0.03), near zero (descriptive pooled {delta} = -0.003, 95% CI -0.016 to +0.010; I2 = 0%), none significant by label-permutation, though smaller proteomic and transcriptomic analyses remain compatible with modest differences. Nominated proteins and metabolites frequently change (48--71% respond, like comparison features), not universal non-response. Nominated CpG sites have lower baseline inter-individual variance (Mann--Whitney P = 1.7 x 10-6 to 4 x 10-3), and apparent methylation persistence attenuates after variance-matching. Conclusions Under the definitions and datasets studied, genetic target support does not consistently predict pharmacodynamic responsiveness and should not be read as a treatment-response or reversibility biomarker; baseline dynamic range should be assessed and controlled when comparing molecular change across selected features. Nominated features are not shown unchanged or to explain residual risk; same-subject longitudinal studies are needed to test prognostic or therapeutic value.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic analysis of blood molecular phenotypes reveals regulatory networks affecting complex traits: a DIRECT study 96%
- Genome-wide association study of 1,391 plasma metabolites in 6,136 Finnish men identifies 303 novel signals and provides biological insights into human diseases 95%
- MR-link-2: pleiotropy robust cis Mendelian randomization validated in four independent gold-standard datasets of causality 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic scores capture genetic modification of the adiposity-cardiometabolic risk factor relationship 95%
- Proteome-wide Mendelian randomization in global biobank meta-analysis reveals multi-ancestry drug targets for common diseases 95%
- The functional impact of rare variation across the regulatory cascade 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A genetic map of human metabolism across the allele frequency spectrum 95%
- A combined polygenic score of 21,293 rare and 22 common variants significantly improves diabetes diagnosis based on hemoglobin A1C levels 95%
- Systematic assessment of regulatory effects of human disease variants in pluripotent cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.