Hierarchical divergence across genomic, phenotypic, and microbiome dimensions in two annual killifish species from Malawi
Joya, T. R.; Warren, P. K.; Thompson, A. W.; Ng'oma, E.
Show abstract
Divergence among populations and species commonly occurs across multiple biological levels, yet the extent to which genomic, phenotypic, and ecological dimensions are coupled remains poorly understood. We integrated whole-genome sequencing, multivariate morphology, population-level phylogenetic structure, and gut microbiome composition to evaluate divergence in two allopatric annual killifish species across spatially structured populations in Malawi. Geographic and hydrological structure emerged as the primary axis of divergence, with strong differentiation between species and among populations. Genome-wide analyses revealed consistent clustering among populations in ordination and phylogenetic analyses, indicating pronounced spatial structuring of genomic variation. Although genomic divergence was widespread, exon-level enrichment analyses revealed distinct signatures across evolutionary scales. Divergence within N. kirki was associated primarily with translation-related functions, whereas divergence within N. wattersi involved ATP biosynthesis and physiological homeostasis. Interspecific divergence was enriched for transcription factor activity and transcription factor binding, implicating regulatory evolution as a major component of species differentiation. Morphological variation was likewise strongly structured among populations and aligned with drainage systems and geographic regions but was not correlated with genome-wide genetic differentiation, indicating partial decoupling between genotype and multivariate phenotype. Gut microbiome composition represented a more environmentally responsive layer of divergence, broadly reflecting host species and drainage structure while exhibiting greater overlap among populations. These results support a hierarchical model in which geographic and hydrological structure organize stable genomic divergence, whereas phenotypic and microbiome variation represent increasingly context-dependent and only partially aligned biological layers. Our findings highlight the value of integrating multiple biological levels to understand how evolutionary processes shape divergence in natural populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental specialization and cryptic genetic divergence in two massive coral species from the Florida Keys Reef Tract 97%
- Divergence, gene flow and the origin of leapfrog geographic distributions: The history of color pattern variation in Phyllobates poison-dart frogs 96%
- Decrypting corals: Does regulatory evolution underlie environmental specialization of coral cryptic lineages? 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevational and Oceanic Barriers Shape the Distribution, Dispersal and Diversity of Aotearoa's Kapokapowai (Uropetala) Dragonflies 95%
- Rapid evolution of recombination landscapes during the divergence of cichlid ecotypes in Lake Masoko 94%
- Testing for a role of postzygotic incompatibilities in rapidly speciated Lake Victoria cichlids 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetic consequences of historic climate change on the contemporary population structure of a widespread temperate North American songbird 94%
- Continental diversification and insular speciation in a widespread passerine (Troglodytes musculus) in southern South America 94%
- Local adaptation fuels cryptic speciation in terrestrial annelids 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Panmixia across elevation in thermally sensitive Andean dung beetles 96%
- Evolutionary history of an Alpine archaeognath(Machilis pallida) - insights from different variant types 95%
- Extensive admixture among karst-obligate salamandersreveals evidence of recent divergence and gene exchangethrough aquifers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.