Back

Sleep reactivation of positive self-evaluation reveals neural-evaluative alignment that varies with depressive symptoms

Yao, Z.; Chen, D.; Liu, J.; Wei, J.; Xia, T.; Zuo, X.; Chen, C. X.; Chan, R. N. Y.; Li, S. X.; Qin, P.; Yuan, T.; Zhang, Z.; Lee, T. M. C.; Ma, Y.; Hu, X.

2026-07-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.26.740831 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Positive self-evaluation underpins resilience and mental health, yet how to enhance positive self-evaluation and the underlying neurocognitive mechanisms remain poorly understood. Existing data mostly examined self-evaluative processing of the wakeful minds, with the role of sleep remain unexplored. Here, we demonstrated that reactivation of positive self-evaluation during sleep revealed fine-grained neural-evaluative alignment that varies with depressive symptoms. We found that targeted reactivation of positive personality traits during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep enhanced positive self-evaluation, but this benefit diminished with elevated depressive symptoms. Moreover, cueing positive traits during NREM sleep elicited trait-specific, 11-16 Hz EEG sigma power-based neural representations that aligned with post-sleep positive self-evaluative representational structures, as revealed by representational similarity analyses. Notably, individuals with elevated depressive symptoms exhibited weaker neural-evaluative representational alignments, identifying a maladaptive self-evaluative processing that bridges across sleep and wakefulness states. These findings provide mechanistic insights on how fine-grained neural-evaluative alignment can substantiate positive self-evaluation, and why it was disrupted as depressive symptoms increased. HighlightsO_LIPositive-trait reactivation during NREM sleep enhances positive self-evaluation C_LIO_LIThis behavioral benefit decreases as depressive symptoms increase C_LIO_LISleep cueing evokes trait-specific sigma-band neural representations C_LIO_LINeural-evaluative alignment weakens as depressive symptoms increase C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.