Back

The Coupled Stochastic Dynamical System: A Generative Model for Simulating and Forecasting Youth Mental Health Trajectories

Koutsouleris, N.; Turner, G.; Penzel, N.; Jacobs, G.; Fietz, J.; Buciuman, M. O.; Urquijo, M. F.; Mena, S.; Fraza, C.; Lalousis, P. A.; Antonucci, L. A.; Schneider, S.; Wang, H.; Jirsa, V.; Slovak, P.; Orben, A.

2026-07-29 health informatics
10.64898/2026.07.26.26358943 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanism-informed models that can simulate counterfactual mental-health trajectories remain scarce in digital phenotyping. Most existing approaches either predict outcomes from sensor-derived data without specifying the cross-domain generative process or reconstruct latent dynamics without encoding the mechanistic assumptions needed for intervention simulation. Here, we introduce the Coupled Stochastic Dynamical System (CSDS), a forward generative model that jointly simulates digital engagement, weara-ble physiology, and psychiatric burden as a family of coupled stochastic processes. Using the multi-year GLOBEM cohort (N=496) integrating passive sensing, ecological momentary assessment, and survey-based measures, we first identified four distinct behavioural phenotypes by clustering. Bayesian inversion of the CSDS satisfied 80-83% of clusters' weighted phenotype targets through separable trait-vulnerability, physical-activity, and affective-response parameter families. Participant-level inversion produced virtual twins that recovered the individual dynamic structure of complex human behaviours: Hidden Markov Models trained on the synthetic timeseries decoded observed state occupancy and transi-tions (r=0.84-0.87 and 0.93-0.94), and outperformed mean- or persistence-based null models in short-horizon magnitude prediction, with sparser affective channels showing horizon-stable directional forecast-ing above chance (66-78% balanced accuracy to 21 days). These findings position generative behaviour-al models as falsifiable and interpretable frameworks for studying youth mental-health trajectories and for developing future personalised interventions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.