Back

Effect of Pre-Pubertal Body Mass Index Status on Longitudinal Height Trajectory in Vietnamese Children: 2018 - 2025 School Health Analysis

Ho, N. T.; Hermiston, M.; Nguyen, Q. T.; Nguyen, M. A.; Nguyen, Q. V.; Dao, A. Q.; Tran, C. T. L.; Nguyen, Q. N.; Phung, L. N.; Do, C. T.; Pham, A. N.

2026-07-29 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.07.26.26358003 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Vietnam and similar low-middle-income countries face a double/triple burden of overweight-obesity, thinness, and stunting. We examined how pre-pubertal BMI affects longitudinal height trajectories in a large Vietnamese cohort. Methods: We analyzed annual school health data from Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Haiphong (2018-2025). Children with greater than or equal to 3 visits (n = 40,887) were classified by WHO BMI category (thinness, normal, overweight, obesity) at sex-specific pre-pubertal index ages (males 11 years, females 9 years). Height trajectories were visualized via LOESS smoothing. Between-group differences were tested using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn post-hoc tests and bootstrap median differences. BMI transitions assessed whether weight-status normalization recovered height potential. Results: At index ages, obese children were taller than normal-BMI peers (+5.1 cm at 11 years, peaking at +5.8 cm at 12 years for males and +4.0 cm at 9 years for females), while thin children were shorter (-3.0 to -4.2 cm). Differences narrowed progressively, becoming non-significant by 15 years in females (p = 0.885) and 17 years in males (p = 0.201). BMI normalization was associated with convergence toward normal-weight peers while persistent thinness showed no recovery. Results were consistent across ages, cities, and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Pre-pubertal BMI shapes the tempo, not outcome, of pubertal height gain, supporting early, sex-specific nutritional intervention without compromising adult height.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.