Cardiovascular Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: A Matched Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Survivors
Dehghan Manshadi, M.; Manouchehri, N.; Hubbert, L.; Liljegren, A.; Manouchehrinia, A.; Linder-stragliotto, C.; Rantala, J.; Hedayati, E.; Kiani, N.
Show abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading non-cancer cause of morbidity among breast cancer (BC) survivors. Among them, women carrying germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA-BC) may be at particular risk of CVD, but evidence is inconsistent. The objective of this study is to determine whether BRCA-BC independently influences the risk for CVD after BC diagnosis in the Stockholm-Gotland region in Sweden (2008-2019). Methods: In this registry-based cohort study, we used exact matching on age at diagnosis, tumor stage, laterality, and pre-existing CVD or risk factors to construct 32 matched (1:1) subgroups. Multi-state Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for transitions from BC diagnosis to first cardiovascular event, while accounting for competing risks of distant metastasis or non-cardiovascular death. Results: In matched subgroups, BRCA-BC experienced fewer CVD (6.4% vs. 11.2% (IQR 9.4%-12.2%), but significantly more competing events (22.3% vs. 10.1% (IQR 8.9%-11.3%); p<0.05. Multi-state Cox models revealed an inverse association between BRCA-BC status and the first cardiovascular event (HR<1), but a higher hazard of the competing risk. Cardiovascular events clustered in the first year after BC diagnosis, especially among BRCA-BC, suggesting truncated time at risk. Conclusion: BRCA-BC did not demonstrate increased cardiovascular risk after BC diagnosis. The apparent inverse association with CVD likely reflects the high incidence of competing risks, which limit the window for CVD to manifest. A small subgroup of long-term BRCA-BC survivors may represent biologically distinct individuals with different cardiovascular susceptibility, warranting further investigation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Free testosterone and malignant melanoma risk in men: prospective analyses of testosterone and SHBG with 19 cancers in men and postmenopausal women UK Biobank 92%
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 92%
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 93%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 93%
- A biomarker of aging, p16, predicts peripheral neuropathy in women receiving adjuvant taxanes for breast cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal relationships between risk of venous thromboembolism and 18 cancers: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis 93%
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer in Korean women 93%
- Healthy lifestyle, genetic risk, and incidence of cancer: A prospective cohort study of 13 cancer types 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Gene Variant Type and Location with Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population 92%
- Reversion and non-reversion mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor or platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer 91%
- Prevalence and mutational determinants of high tumor mutation burden in breast cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.