Dataset-Dependent Utility of Discrete Ricci Curvature for Transition-Region Ranking in Single-Cell Lineage Graphs
Ndubuisi, C. W.
Show abstract
Discrete Ricci curvature is an appealing descriptor for single-cell trajectory graphs, but its practical value depends on task validity, graph-topology controls, and whether the biological target is a local transition region or a broader fate decision. We present a controlled empirical study of when curvature features add information to single-cell lineage graphs after repairing unsupported task definitions and preserving strong graph baselines. Paul15 is used as a benchmark-repair and boundary-setting dataset: on the repaired annotation-informed branch-region proxy, graph-plus-Forman and graph-plus-Ollivier improve modestly over graph topology alone (exact AUPRC 0.652 and 0.635 versus 0.607). Pancreas provides the clearest positive transition-region ranking result. On a Fev+ endocrine transition-region benchmark, graph-plus-Ollivier reaches exact AUPRC 0.761 versus 0.669 for the graph-feature stack (five-split canonical evaluation, paired mean +0.092, 95% CI [0.076, 0.114]), and a restricted preterminal endocrine fate task improves under both curvature hybrids. The primary evaluation is transductive node ranking; graph-attachment analyses provide supporting out-of-sample robustness checks. Zebrafish provides a realism check: branch-region ranking again benefits from a hybrid model, with graph-plus-Forman strongest (0.704 versus 0.593 for graph topology), whereas a valid early Notochord versus Prechordal Plate task is graph-topology dominated on the canonical graph. Supplementary checks, including a stricter zebrafish sample-token holdout, biologically grounded bottleneck proxy, negative controls, and pairwise transfer, sharpen the same conclusion without expanding the claim set. Curvature can add useful, dataset-dependent hybrid signal for lineage transition-region tasks, but curvature-only models are weak and graph topology remains essential and sometimes sufficient.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple neural network approaches, including use of topological data analysis, enhances classification of human induced pluripotent stem cell colonies by treatment condition 93%
- Accessible, Reproducible, and Scalable Machine Learning for Biomedicine 93%
- Joint representation of molecular networks from multiple species improves gene classification 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust Evaluation of Deep Learning-based Representation Methods for Survival and Gene Essentiality Prediction on Bulk RNA-seq Data 92%
- Unsupervised generative and graph representation learning for modelling cell differentiation 91%
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Voting-based integration algorithm improves causal network learning from interventional and observational data: an application to cell signaling network inference 91%
- scAEGAN: Unification of Single-Cell Genomics Data by Adversarial Learning of Latent Space Correspondences 91%
- Compressive Big Data Analytics: An Ensemble Meta-Algorithm for High-dimensional Multisource Datasets 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- scValue: value-based subsampling of large-scale single-cell transcriptomic data for machine and deep learning tasks 93%
- Evaluation of out-of-distribution detection methods for data shifts in single-cell transcriptomics 93%
- Data-driven selection of analysis decisions in single-cell RNA-seq trajectory inference 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.