Back

Effectiveness of the University Executive Network-Training Program (NExT-U) on executive functions in university students

Diaz-Guerra, D.; Fernandez-Castillo, E.; Ramos-Galarza, C.; De la Torre Perez, M.; Gonzalez Espinosa, Y.; Hernandez-Lugo, M.; Lugones Dapresa, V.; Broche-Perez, Y.

2026-08-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.25.740682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionExecutive functions (EF) are higher-order cognitive processes essential for academic performance in university settings. Although there is extensive research on EF training in children, studies in young adults are scarce, particularly those involving interventions tailored to specific needs. ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of the University Executive Network-Training Program (NExT-U), based on specific needs, on the executive functioning of Cuban university students. MethodologyA quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group and pretest-posttest measurements. Participants were 27 second-year Psychology students (74% female; mean age = 19 years). The experimental group (n=7) received three training sessions focused on Conscious Regulation of Behavior, Decision-Making, Emotional Regulation, and Monitoring of Responsibilities, identified through an initial assessment using the UEF-1 Scale. The control group (n=20) continued with their usual academic activities. Non-parametric analyses and the residual gain method were employed. ResultsThe experimental group showed significant improvements in Conscious Regulation of Behavior (p = .026; r = .51), Emotional Regulation (p = .030; r = .49), and the Supervisory Attention System (p = .046; r = .44), with large effect sizes. The control group experienced no significant changes in any of the functions evaluated. ConclusionsA brief, personalized program can enhance specific executive functions in university students, demonstrating cognitive plasticity in young adults. The findings support the design of contextually relevant interventions to strengthen transversal competencies in higher education.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.